Arlington Virginia State Law 46.2 862

Tags

888-437-7747, Arlington, Arlington Lawyer, Arlington virginia, Arlington Virginia Attorney, Arlington Virginia Attorneys, Arlington Virginia Law, Arlington virginia laws, Arlington Virginia Lawyer, Arlington Virginia Lawyers, Arlington Virginia Reckless Driving Lawyer, Defendant, Law Group, Measuring Device, Miles Per Hour, Necessary Experience, Traffic Case, V Smith, Virginia Arlington Attorneys, Virginia Arlington Laws, Virginia Arlington Lawyer, Virginia Code, Virginia Court, virginia lawyers, Virginia Legislature, Virginia State Law

State Law 46.2 862 Charge – Virginia Lawyers

If you are dealing with a State Law 46.2 862 charge in Virginia, contact our law firm immediately for help.

State Law 46.2 862 defense in Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Commonwealth v. Smith

Facts:

Defendant appealed her conviction by the Circuit Court of Arlington (Virginia) of reckless driving by speeding 70 miles per hour in a 45 miles-per-hour zone in Virginia State under Virginia Code Ann. § 46.2-862, following the denial of her motion to strike the evidence obtained by pacing to prove her speed, alleging that pacing as per law was not a method for determining speed listed in Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-882.

If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

• Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-882 is a statute permitting the admissibility of evidence. It is not a statute of exclusion. It sanctions four types of scientific evidence that determine speed by eliminating the need to prove that the underlying scientific principle or technique of the measuring device is reliable.
• Nothing in Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-882 suggests it is meant to limit the means for proving speed. The statute itself states that speed “may” be determined by the enumerated means. “The word “may” is prima facie permissive, importing discretion, but the courts construe it to be mandatory when it is necessary to accomplish the manifest purpose of the Virginia legislature. Even lay witness testimony has always been an acceptable method of the speed of a car. The statute does not prevent the Commonwealth from proving a vehicle’s speed by other methods.
• One of the easiest methods of proving a vehicle’s speed is by pacing. This involves accurately determining the speed of one vehicle while proceeding at a constant distance from a second vehicle. If the distance between the two vehicles remains constant, the speed of the second vehicle must be the same as the known speed of the first vehicle. Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-942 clearly contemplates the use of pacing as a method of determining a vehicle’s speed by authorizing the admission of calibration tests to prove the accuracy of an arresting officer’s speedometer.

State Law 46.2 862 defense in Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Article written by A Sris
Sris Law Group
1-703-278-0405

Advertisements

Police Prove Passed School Bus Arlington Virginia

Tags

888-437-7747, Appellate Courts, Arlington, Arlington Lawyer, Arlington virginia, Arlington Virginia Attorney, Arlington Virginia Attorneys, Arlington Virginia Law, Arlington virginia laws, Arlington Virginia Lawyer, Arlington Virginia Lawyers, Arlington Virginia Traffic Laws, Bus Signs, Criminal Case, Criminal Negligence, Flashing Lights, Inferences, Involuntary Manslaughter, Law Group, Necessary Experience, Reckless Indifference, School Bus, Trial Court, Virginia Arlington Attorneys, Virginia Arlington Laws, Virginia Arlington Lawyer, Virginia Court, virginia lawyers

How would the Police Prove I Passed A School Bus – Virginia Lawyers

If you are concerned about How would the Police Prove I Passed A School Bus In Virginia, contact our law firm immediately for help.

How would the Police Prove I Passed A School Bus – Attorneys In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Kenith v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Appellant challenged his conviction of involuntary manslaughter in the operation of a motor vehicle in violation of Va. Code Ann. §§ 18.2-30, 18.2-36, entered in the Circuit Court of Arlington (Virginia), claiming the evidence was insufficient to convict him of the offense for which he had been detained by the police. The Commonwealth was able to prove that if the appellant’s attention were not diverted, he would have seen the school bus signs and flashing lights before he passed it. Judgment affirmed.

If you are facing a criminal case in Arlington, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

• When considering the sufficiency of the evidence, appellate courts examine the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom. The judgment of a trial court will be disturbed only if plainly wrong or without evidence to support it
• Criminal negligence is the basis for involuntary manslaughter and has been defined as acting consciously in disregard of another person’s rights or acting with reckless indifference to the consequences, with the defendant aware, from his knowledge of existing circumstances and conditions, that his conduct probably would cause injury to another.
• A defendant accused of criminal negligence must have had prior knowledge of specific conditions that would likely cause injury to others.

How would the Police Prove I Passed A School Bus – Attorneys In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Article written by A Sris
Sris Law Group
1-703-278-0405

Arlington Virginia 46.2-862

Tags

888-437-7747, Arlington, Arlington Lawyer, Arlington virginia, Arlington Virginia Attorney, Arlington Virginia Attorneys, Arlington Virginia Law, Arlington virginia laws, Arlington Virginia Lawyer, Arlington Virginia Lawyers, Arlington Virginia Reckless Driving Lawyer, Commonwealth, Defendant, Jury Instructions, Law Group, Maximum Speed, Maximum Speed Limit, Miles Per Hour, Necessary Experience, Reckless Driving, Traffic Case, Twenty Miles, Virginia Arlington Attorneys, Virginia Arlington Laws, Virginia Arlington Lawyer, Virginia Court, virginia lawyers

46.2-862 Charge Of Reckless Driving – Virginia Lawyers

If you are dealing with a 46.2-862 Charge Of Reckless Driving in Virginia, contact our law firm immediately for help.

46.2-862 Charge Of Reckless Driving defense in Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

James Peter v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant was charged with driving under the influence of intoxicants and with speeding 55 miles per hour in a 25 mile per hour zone. Both charges grew out of the same driving activity. Defendant prepaid the speeding charge and claimed that Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-862 converted his speeding charge to a reckless driving charge. Defendant alleged that he was convicted of speeding by virtue of this payment of the fines and costs and therefore he could not be prosecuted for the driving under the influence charge because Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-294.1 prevented dual convictions of driving under the influence and reckless driving. On review, the court disagreed holding that defendant’s argument required that he be charged with and convicted of reckless driving. The court stated that speeding was a traffic infraction and reckless driving was a misdemeanor. In addition, the court determined that § 19.2-294.1 only applied if defendant was charged with driving under the influence and reckless driving. The court held that where the evidence supported prosecution under two parallel statutes, the Commonwealth had the right to elect under which statute to proceed.

If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

• Under Va. Code Ann. § 16.1-69.40:1, it is not possible for a defendant to prepay the fine for a reckless driving charge as it is expressly forbidden by Va. Code Ann. § 16.1-69.40:1(d).
• Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-294 states that if a defendant is charged with driving under the influence of intoxicants and with reckless driving and he is convicted of one of those charges, then the court shall dismiss the remaining charge. The purpose of § 19.2-294 is to prevent the conviction of two different class one misdemeanors arising out of the same driving acts, when one of the misdemeanors is driving under the influence of intoxicants and the other is reckless driving. Where the evidence supports prosecution under either of two parallel statutes, the Commonwealth has the right to elect under which statute to proceed.

46.2-862 Charge Of Reckless Driving defense in Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Article written by A Sris
Sris Law Group
1-703-278-0405

Penalty Driving Suspended License Arlington Virginia

Tags

888-437-7747, Arlington, Arlington Lawyer, Arlington virginia, Arlington Virginia Attorney, Arlington Virginia Attorneys, Arlington Virginia Law, Arlington virginia laws, Arlington Virginia Lawyer, Arlington Virginia Lawyers, Arlington Virginia Traffic Laws, Code 46, Driving On A Suspended License, Driving Privileges, Financial Responsibility, Habitual Offender, Law Group, Necessary Experience, Petitioner, Reinstatement, Suspensions, Traffic Case, Virginia Arlington Attorneys, Virginia Arlington Laws, Virginia Arlington Lawyer, Virginia Court, virginia lawyers, Waiting Period

Penalty For Driving On A Suspended License – Virginia Lawyers

If you are concerned about the Penalty For Driving On A Suspended License In Virginia, contact our law firm immediately for help.

Penalty For Driving On A Suspended License – Attorneys In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Jessica v. Commonwealth

Facts:

The petitioner filed for restoration of her operator’s license, alleging that her status as a habitual offender was based on her predicate convictions for driving on a suspended license resulting from failure to pay fines and costs as penalty for her driving offense. The prosecution asserted that petitioner was ineligible for reinstatement of her driving privileges under Va. Code § 46.2-361(B).

If you are facing a traffic case in Arlington, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

• When a person has been adjudged an habitual offender based solely upon convictions of driving on a suspended license for failure to pay fines and costs, or failure to provide proof of financial responsibility, that person may petition the court at any time for restoration of his or her license upon proof that all outstanding fines and costs have been paid or that proof of financial responsibility has been furnished. In other words, there is no mandatory waiting period.
• A suspension of a driver’s license under Va. Code § 46.2-706 or Va. Code § 46.2-390.1 is not one of those suspensions which, when it is a basis of predicate convictions, enables a person to seek restoration upon payment of all fines and costs.

Penalty For Driving On A Suspended License – Attorneys In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Article written by A Sris
Sris Law Group
1-703-278-0405

Arlington Virginia 82-1-6 / 46.2-852 Penalty

Tags

888-437-7747, Arlington, Arlington Lawyer, Arlington virginia, Arlington Virginia Attorney, Arlington Virginia Attorneys, Arlington Virginia Law, Arlington virginia laws, Arlington Virginia Lawyer, Arlington Virginia Lawyers, Commonwealth, Convictions, Defendant, Disregard, Habitual Offender, Indifference, Inference, Law Group, Motor Vehicle, Necessary Experience, reckless driving va, Traffic Case, Virginia Arlington Attorneys, Virginia Arlington Laws, Virginia Arlington Lawyer, Virginia Court, virginia lawyers

82-1-6 / 46.2-852 Penalty – Virginia Lawyers

If you are concerned about a 82-1-6 / 46.2-852 Penalty In Virginia, contact our law firm immediately for help.

82-1-6 / 46.2-852 Penalty – Attorneys In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Block v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant appealed from an order of the Circuit Court of Arlington (Virginia), which convicted him for reckless driving and feloniously driving after having been adjudicated an habitual offender in violation of Va. Code Ann. §§ 46.2-852 and 46.2-357(B)(2), respectively and also impose penalty for driving offense, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions.

If you are facing a traffic case in Arlington, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

• Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-852 provides, in part, that any person who drives a vehicle on any highway recklessly or at a speed in a manner so as to endanger the life, limb, or property of any person shall be guilty of reckless driving. Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-852. The word “recklessly” as used in the statute imparts a disregard by the driver of a motor vehicle for the consequences of his act and an indifference to the safety of life, limb or property. The essence of the offense lies not in the act of operating a vehicle, but in the manner and circumstances of its operation. Thus, the mere happening of an accident does not give rise to an inference of reckless driving. To convict, the Commonwealth of Virginia must prove every essential element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt, with evidence which excludes every reasonable hypothesis of innocence and consistent only with guilt.
• Reckless driving is not a status offense, and a defendant cannot be convicted upon speculation and conjecture as to what caused him to lose control of the car.

82-1-6 / 46.2-852 Penalty – Attorneys In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Article written by A Sris
Sris Law Group
1-703-278-0405

Arlington Virginia Traffic Code 46.2-862

Tags

888-437-7747, Appellate Court, Arlington, Arlington Lawyer, Arlington virginia, Arlington Virginia Attorney, Arlington Virginia Attorneys, Arlington Virginia Law, Arlington virginia laws, Arlington Virginia Lawyer, Arlington Virginia Lawyers, Arlington Virginia Traffic Laws, Code 46, Culpability, Fredericksburg, Jury Instruction, Jury Instructions, Law Group, Necessary Experience, Reckless Driving, Traffic Case, Traffic Code, Virginia Arlington Attorneys, Virginia Arlington Laws, Virginia Arlington Lawyer, Virginia Court, virginia lawyers

Concerned about the punishment for a Virginia Traffic Code 46.2-862 Charge – Virginia Lawyers

If you are concerned about the punishment for a Virginia Traffic Code 46.2-862 Charge, contact our law firm immediately for help.

Concerned about the punishment for a Virginia Traffic Code 46.2-862 Charge – Attorneys In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Greet v. Commonwealth

Facts:

A jury in the Circuit Court of Arlington County (Virginia) convicted defendant of reckless driving by speed, in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-862. Defendant appealed. Defendant argued that the trial court erred in denying her proposed jury instruction that improper driving, an offense set forth in Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-869, was a lesser-included offense of reckless driving by speed. The appellate court disagreed. Improper driving was not a lesser-included offense of reckless driving by speed. Every commission of reckless driving by speed did not also constitute improper driving. In addition, improper driving was not composed entirely of the elements of reckless driving by speed. Improper driving required an additional finding of slight culpability, an element excluded from § 46.2-862.

If you are facing a traffic case in Arlington, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

• A reviewing court’s responsibility in reviewing jury instructions is to see that the law has been clearly stated and that the instructions cover all issues which the evidence fairly raises.
• For a defendant to be found guilty of reckless driving by speed under Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-862, the Commonwealth must prove that the defendant was driving on a highway in the Commonwealth, and was driving (i) at a speed of twenty miles per hour or more in excess of the applicable maximum speed limit or (ii) in excess of eighty miles per hour regardless of the applicable maximum speed limit.

Concerned about the punishment for a Virginia Traffic Code 46.2-862 Charge – Attorneys In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Article written by A Sris
Sris Law Group
1-703-278-0405

Virginia Arlington Reckless Driving Speeding Misdemeanor

Tags

888-437-7747, Arlington, Arlington Lawyer, Arlington virginia, Arlington Virginia Attorney, Arlington Virginia Attorneys, Arlington Virginia Law, Arlington virginia laws, Arlington Virginia Lawyer, Arlington Virginia Lawyers, Arlington Virginia Reckless Driving Lawyer, Class 1 misdemeanor, Defendant, Dui Charge, Dui Conviction, Jail Sentence, Law Group, Misdemeanor Charge, Misdemeanor Defense, Necessary Experience, Traffic Case, Virginia Arlington Attorneys, Virginia Arlington Laws, Virginia Arlington Lawyer, Virginia Court, virginia lawyers, Virginia Reckless Driving

Reckless Driving Speeding Misdemeanor – Virginia Lawyers

If you are dealing with a Reckless Driving Speeding Misdemeanor charge in Virginia, contact our law firm immediately for help.

Reckless Driving Speeding Misdemeanor defense in Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Arlington Lawyers Violation Code 18.2-266

Dillon v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant was convicted in the Circuit Court of Arlington (Virginia) of DUI in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266. Defendant contended that the lower court was required to dismiss the DUI charge because he had already pled guilty and been convicted of an offense that was by statute deemed reckless driving. The court disagreed and held that reckless driving and speeding were separate and distinct offenses.

If you are facing a traffic case in Arlington, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

• Reckless driving is chargeable and punishable under the provisions of Article 7 in the Motor Vehicle Code chapter on the regulation of traffic. Reckless driving is a Class 1 misdemeanor, Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-868, carrying with it the potential for a twelve month jail sentence and a fine of not more than $ 2,500 under Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-1(a).
• Under the express provisions of Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-294.1, only a conviction for reckless driving bars a prosecution for DUI. A conviction for speeding, even if premised on an underlying act that may have warranted a conviction for reckless driving, does not implicate the bar of the statute.

Reckless Driving Speeding Misdemeanor defense in Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Article written by A Sris
Sris Law Group
1-703-278-0405

Arlington Reckless Driving Traffic Ticket Virginia

Tags

888-437-7747, Arlington, Arlington Lawyer, Arlington virginia, Arlington Virginia Attorney, Arlington Virginia Attorneys, Arlington Virginia Law, Arlington virginia laws, Arlington Virginia Lawyer, Arlington Virginia Lawyers, Class 1 misdemeanor, Driving under the influence, Driving Under The Influence Of Alcohol, Dui Conviction, Jail Sentence, Law Group, Necessary Experience, Speeding Conviction, Traffic Case, Traffic Ticket Attorneys, Traffic Traffic, Virginia Arlington Attorneys, Virginia Arlington Laws, Virginia Arlington Lawyer, Virginia Court, virginia lawyers

Reckless Driving Traffic Ticket – Virginia Lawyers

If you are concerned about a Reckless Driving Traffic Ticket in Virginia, contact our law firm immediately for help.

Reckless Driving Traffic Ticket – Attorneys In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Arlington v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant was convicted in the Circuit Court of Arlington (Virginia) of DUI in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266. He had previously pled guilty to speeding in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-870. Both charges arose from the same course of driving. He asserted that the DUI conviction was barred by Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-294.1 because the speeding conviction constituted a conviction for reckless driving.

If you are facing a traffic case in Arlington, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

• Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-294.1 provides that whenever any person is charged with driving under the influence of alcohol and reckless driving growing out of the same act or acts and is convicted of one of these charges, the court shall dismiss the remaining charge.
• Reckless driving is chargeable and punishable under the provisions of Article 7 in the Motor Vehicle Code chapter on the regulation of traffic. Traffic ticket for Reckless driving is a Class 1 misdemeanor, Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-868, carrying with it the potential for a twelve month jail sentence and a fine of not more than $ 2,500 under Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-1(a)..

Reckless Driving Traffic Ticket – Attorneys In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Article written by A Sris
Sris Law Group
1-703-278-0405

Court Appeal Arlington Reckless Driving Virginia

Tags

888-437-7747, Arlington, Arlington Lawyer, Arlington virginia, Arlington Virginia Attorney, Arlington Virginia Attorneys, Arlington Virginia Law, Arlington virginia laws, Arlington Virginia Lawyer, Arlington Virginia Lawyers, Arlington Virginia Reckless Driving Lawyer, Court Appeal, Cross Examination, Defendant, Law Group, Mistrial, Municipal Ordinances, Necessary Experience, Reckless Driving Charge, Reckless Driving Virginia, Traffic Case, Trial Court, Virginia Arlington Attorneys, Virginia Arlington Laws, Virginia Arlington Lawyer, Virginia Court, virginia lawyers

Court Appeal Of A Reckless Driving Charge – Virginia Lawyers

There are many different penalties for a Reckless Driving Charge In Virginia.

If you are dealing with a Court Appeal Of A Reckless Driving charge in Virginia, contact our law firm immediately for help.

Court Appeal Of A Reckless Driving charge in Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Luther Sr. v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Defendant was convicted for drunk driving and for reckless driving. On appeal, the court affirmed. The court held that the two convictions did not violate Va. Code Ann. § 19-232, which prohibited two convictions for the same act, because defendant was driving drunk and was driving recklessly, two acts that were not necessarily part and parcel of the same act. The court also held that the defendant could not challenge the trial court’s denial of the state’s motion to sever the charges because defendant did not object to the trial court’s ruling at the time it was entered. The court further held that defendant could not obtain a mistrial based on prejudicial testimony that defendant’s counsel elicited through questions on cross-examination.

If you are facing a traffic case in Arlington, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

• Va. Code Ann. § 19-232 reads that if the same act be a violation of two or more statutes or of two or more municipal ordinances or of one or more statutes and also one or more ordinances, conviction under one of such statutes or ordinances shall be a bar to a prosecution or proceeding under the other or others. Furthermore, if the same act be a violation of both a State and a federal statute a prosecution or proceeding under the federal statute shall be a bar to a prosecution or proceeding under the State statute.
• It frequently has been held that reckless driving and driving while under the influence of intoxicants, where both are involved in the same occurrence, are separate acts and therefore constitute separate offenses, and the prosecution for one offense is no bar to a prosecution for that coupled with it.

Court Appeal Of A Reckless Driving charge in Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Article written by A Sris
Sris Law Group
1-703-278-0405

Drivers License Lawyers Arlington Virginia

Tags

888-437-7747, Arlington, Arlington Lawyer, Arlington virginia, Arlington Virginia Attorney, Arlington Virginia Attorneys, Arlington Virginia Law, Arlington virginia laws, Arlington Virginia Lawyer, Arlington Virginia Lawyers, Arlington Virginia Traffic Laws, Breath Test, Drivers License, General District Court, Issuance, Law Group, Lawyers Virginia, Magistrate, Motor Vehicle, Necessary Experience, Traffic Case, Virginia Arlington Attorneys, Virginia Arlington Laws, Virginia Arlington Lawyer, Virginia Court, virginia lawyers

Drivers License – Virginia Lawyers

If you are concerned about a Drivers License Charge in Virginia, contact our law firm immediately for help.

Drivers License Charge – Attorneys In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

White v. Commonwealth

Facts:

Appellant drivers challenged orders of the Circuit Court of Arlington County (Virginia), which held that it did not have jurisdiction to review the suspension of their driver’s licenses for seven days, pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-391.2, after the drivers were arrested for driving while intoxicated..

If you are facing a traffic case in Arlington, Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help. You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

• Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-391.2(A) requires the automatic seven-day suspension of the driver’s license of any person arrested for driving while intoxicated if the driver fails a breath test administered pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-268.2, or any person who refuses to take a breath test as required by Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-268.3. When the driver either fails the breath test or refuses to take it, he or she is taken before a magistrate and a warrant is issued for the driver’s arrest. Upon issuance of the warrant, the magistrate automatically suspends the accused’s driving privilege for seven days pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-391.2. Any person whose license or privilege to operate a motor vehicle has been suspended may, during the period of the suspension, request the general district court of the jurisdiction in which the arrest was made to review that suspension. Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-391.2(C).

Drivers License Charge – Attorneys In Virginia

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Article written by A Sris
Sris Law Group
1-703-278-0405